I messed up the title. Changed some details in the post for anonymity while forgetting to update the title. The premise of my post is true. I myself, don't know anything about that other post.
Yes, YTA for accepting an unreasonable condition to help one of your children at the expense of the other. Would you daughter really have found other accommodations to watch the baby if you stood fast on the "no-pets" rule? Doubtful. Most animals get along well with children. If nothing else, you can find a way to keep them apart if need be.
I don't really want to watch the dogs and grandson at the same time. Thats why I was fine with the rule. My husband works so its primarily me at home all day.
the title on this post doesn't match the body either. It says "Sons Dogs" and then goes on to talk about having two daughters.
I messed up the title. Changed some details in the post for anonymity while forgetting to update the title. The premise of my post is true. I myself, don't know anything about that other post.
Yes, YTA for accepting an unreasonable condition to help one of your children at the expense of the other. Would you daughter really have found other accommodations to watch the baby if you stood fast on the "no-pets" rule? Doubtful. Most animals get along well with children. If nothing else, you can find a way to keep them apart if need be.
I don't really want to watch the dogs and grandson at the same time. Thats why I was fine with the rule. My husband works so its primarily me at home all day.