Well, considering there are people who advocate for focusing on income inequality (to a variety of degrees, with a wide variety of opinions about what "solving it" looks like), and they remain unassassinated, the person would likely be okay.
I’m thinking more along the lines of someone as influential and a threat to profits as MLK. A 10-million man march in Washington led by someone set on dismantling unregulated capitalism. How soon would they be gone?
The people who started OWS, again, remained unassassinated. As for "unregulated capitalism," people advocate for stricter regulations or better enforcement of regulations all the time (often without much success, sadly; we seem to be headed in the other direction). Unfortunately, grassroots movements like you're talking about tend to be ineffective all on their own. The biggest problem tends to be dilution: The more people join in, the more they start bringing in their own hot-button issues, and the movement as a whole starts to lose its focus on a specific message. By the time it reached that sort of mass, the movement would be pulling itself in a bunch of different directions all on its own and just be a general left-wing populist group.
I thought the start was the best. Second year got kind of rough, third year was the pits of despair, and by fourth year I was over it so it actually got better.
Nothing wrong with being anti-Republican. They’re regressive anti-humanity assholes. I don’t care if that’s an overgeneralization. They voted for someone who is much worse than my description of them.
The weird bush
Who is #4?
It confirms something really sad Farley said about himself: Everyone loves to see fatty fall down.
This fact will never change. Fat people will always be seen as lesser than, and will always be seen as an abject moral and in general failure.
Could. I could also win a billion dollars.
no chance of success and a big waste of everyone's time. he should reconsider.
Rage bait to get engagement. And it’s working.
Anyone see her video leak?
Too little too late. Should have never been allowed in the US from the beginning.
Arkansas, 1920s…yea i wouldnt be allowed at this wedding lmaooo
If you weren’t allowed then, you wouldn’t be allowed today. Not much has changed on that front.
He’s great!!
Well, considering there are people who advocate for focusing on income inequality (to a variety of degrees, with a wide variety of opinions about what "solving it" looks like), and they remain unassassinated, the person would likely be okay.
I’m thinking more along the lines of someone as influential and a threat to profits as MLK. A 10-million man march in Washington led by someone set on dismantling unregulated capitalism. How soon would they be gone?
The people who started OWS, again, remained unassassinated. As for "unregulated capitalism," people advocate for stricter regulations or better enforcement of regulations all the time (often without much success, sadly; we seem to be headed in the other direction). Unfortunately, grassroots movements like you're talking about tend to be ineffective all on their own. The biggest problem tends to be dilution: The more people join in, the more they start bringing in their own hot-button issues, and the movement as a whole starts to lose its focus on a specific message. By the time it reached that sort of mass, the movement would be pulling itself in a bunch of different directions all on its own and just be a general left-wing populist group.
I genuinely appreciate your thoughtful response. The only gripe I have is calling my paranoia a persecution complex.
Still scratching my head how 3 time GED flunkie can be elected to run our country.
Ted Cruz is how
I thought the start was the best. Second year got kind of rough, third year was the pits of despair, and by fourth year I was over it so it actually got better.
Just curious can you elaborate what made the 3rd year so difficult?
I want to (and try to) sleep with every woman I’m attracted to.
https://giphy.com/gifs/nqCFcCwmMPWEk7P8hO
Lol the president is portrayed as ‘an authoritarian anti-journalistic president that shoots people who ask questions’.
Nothing wrong with being anti-Republican. They’re regressive anti-humanity assholes. I don’t care if that’s an overgeneralization. They voted for someone who is much worse than my description of them.
Silicon Valley doesn’t care. VC’s don’t care. C-suite doesn’t care.
That dude needs to drink some water
Looks like she doesn’t know what she’s doing
Angie, Cynthia, Naomi, McKenzie
She does not look happy to be there.....
Never met a sane person with dyed hair
Anybody else wish they had the confidence of a mediocre white Gen Z “dancing” in front of a camera?
Looks like there’s some dust bunnies under there
I know nothing of the allegations, i really hope they aren't true. I am just curious, have you read the book yourself?
Yep! It was fine, I guess. It just seemed more like a collection of topics you could find by googling clinical psychology 101.
Okay, that’s enough internet for today. Jesus
Their “In the VIP” episodes are amazing. Not as much a fan of their gonzo stuff, but I love how their production quality has improved.
The one where it’s two girls and one of them squirts while riding the guy changed my life